Argumentation for Multi-party Privacy Management
نویسندگان
چکیده
Social network services enable users to share large quantities of private information. Often, the shared information concerns individuals who are members of the social network but did not upload the information to the service. In such situations, inappropriate sharing preferences can cause conflict and threaten users’ privacy. Since related studies suggest that users prefer to solve multi-party privacy conflicts through negotiation, we introduce a novel approach based on negotiation through arguments. In our approach, users propose privacy settings and support their proposals with logical arguments. The final decision is based on a setting supported by sound arguments.
منابع مشابه
Computational argumentation to support multi-party human-robot interaction: challenges and advantages
Recent work has explored the use of computational argumentation-based dialogues as a mechanism to support two-party human-robot interaction and collaborative decision making. Many real-world application scenarios involve interaction between multiple humans and multiple robots—not just two parties, i.e., not just one human and one robot. In this paper, a range of social issues are considered tha...
متن کاملPrivacy-preserving naive Bayes classification on distributed data via semi-trusted mixers
Distributed data mining applications, such as those dealing with health care, finance, counter-terrorism and homeland defense, use sensitive data from distributed databases held by different parties. This comes into direct conflict with an individual’s need and right to privacy. It is thus of great importance to develop adequate security techniques In this paper, we consider privacy-preserving ...
متن کاملFair and Privacy-Preserving Multi-party Protocols for Reconciling Ordered Input Sets
In this paper, we introduce the first protocols for multi-party, privacy-preserving, fair reconciliation of ordered sets. Our contributions are twofold. First, we show that it is possible to extend the round-based construction for fair, two-party privacypreserving reconciliation of ordered sets to multiple parties using a multi-party privacy-preserving set intersection protocol. Second, we prop...
متن کاملArgumentation in Multi-issue Debates
An axiomatic modeling approach to multi-issue debates is proposed. A debate is viewed as a decision procedure consisting of two stages: (1) an “argumentation rule” determines what arguments are admissible for each party, given the “raw data”, depending on the issue or set of issues under discussion; (2) a “persuasion rule” determines the strength of the admissible arguments and selects the winn...
متن کاملSemantic Security: Privacy Definitions Revisited
In this paper we illustrate a privacy framework named Indistinguishable Privacy. Indistinguishable privacy could be deemed as the formalization of the existing privacy definitions in privacy preserving data publishing as well as secure multi-party computation. We introduce three representative privacy notions in the literature, Bayes-optimal privacy for privacy preserving data publishing, diffe...
متن کامل